The study of Filipino, Panitikan and theĬonstitution best tackles the mandate of the State. This actually negates the 1987 Constitution, which stipulates that the State To require additional courses in Filipino, Panitikan and the Constitution. Programs, and does not limit the academic freedom of universities and colleges The minimum standards for the general education component of all degree SC argues that Commission on Higher Education (CHED) Memorandum 20 only sets Philippines out of the neocolonial and market-oriented quagmire. Scrapped altogether due to its impact on public education serving only foreignĮconomic interests and the need for an alternative curriculum that will shapeĬritical, patriotic, and progressive nation builders who will lead the Urgently brings the debate back to the call for the K to 12 curriculum to be Secondary levels, the fundamentals of nationalism, patriotism and constitutionalismĪre being replaced by market criteria of corporate and foreign employability, Alongside the K to 12 curriculum at primary and Supreme Court’s (SC) upholding of the removal of Filipino, Panitikan (literature), and Constitution as core subjects of theĬollege curriculum is the latest assault of neoliberal standards on the
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |